Partnerships for Nature: insights from Indigenous-led models in Canada
15 April 2025 / WORDS BY Pollination Foundation
read article
London+44 203 355 1556
Sydney+61 2 8313 7109
Melbourne +61 2 8313 7109
Chicago+1 872 201 1168
Washington +1 872 201 1168
To get a sense of how global nature finance is evolving, we asked a range of institutional investors about their experiences investing in nature. We uncovered their motivations, ambitions, and what they consider to be the greatest risks and opportunities in the nature space – forming the backbone of the inaugural Pollination Nature Finance Focus report.
View reportClimate Asset Management, the specialist “natural capital” investment manager formed by HSBC Asset Management (HSBA.L) and climate change advisory firm Pollination Group, said it has raised $650 million for projects which aim to protect the environment.
Its investors are corporates, ranging from some of the top global 100 companies to smaller niche players, Martin Berg, CAM’s chief investment officer, said. Rather than financial returns, these investors will receive carbon credits.
“We thought the main target (for the funds) would be institutional investors but we now recognise corporates are key players … they are really becoming (big) investors in this,” he said.
Through its Natural Capital Strategy’s flagship 15-year Natural Capital Fund, CAM is targeting a 10% return on investment before fees on projects in regenerative agriculture and forestry in developed markets. CAM’s second strategy, its Nature Based Carbon Strategy, taps into increasing corporate demand for verifiable carbon offsets and will finance nature-based carbon projects in developing economies.
17 June 2024 / WORDS BY Maggie Comstock
Article 6 of the Paris Agreement recognizes that countries may choose to cooperate in meeting their national climate goals (or nationally determined contributions (NDCs)), including through international carbon trading. Decisions under the United National Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) from COP26 in Glasgow and beyond provide important guidance to countries and other market participants on how carbon credits or “mitigation outcomes” should be internationally transferred.
In December 2023 at COP28 in Dubai, countries failed to agree on the next iteration of guidance, which dealt a blow to market actors seeking clear rules and guidance. This delay not only prolongs uncertainty for country-to-country transactions, but also has implications for the international aviation carbon market, as well as for voluntary carbon market players who wish to partake in Article 6. While gaps in guidance can create market uncertainties, they do not prevent cooperation under Article 6.
Each year, countries convene in Bonn, Germany to negotiate the technical elements of the Paris Agreement with a focus on Article 6 guidance as part of the annual UNFCCC intersessional meetings. While countries made some positive progress in Bonn, it all comes down to whether agreement can be reached at COP29 in Baku to adopt this next tranche of guidance.
Here are Pollination’s key takeaways on the outcomes of the Article 6 discussions and why they matter:
– Supporters of centralisation: Some countries want a more centralised approach to the international registry, whereby it could service all potential registry functions, including issuing carbon credits, for countries that do not have national registries; and
– Supporters of decentralisation: Another group of countries prefer a more decentralised approach, where the international registry serves a tracking and recording function, though the credits would be issued elsewhere (e.g., in the Article 6.4 Mechanism registry, national registries, or third-party registries).
Most, but not all, developing countries support the more centralised model, as they argue that a fully-functional and interoperable international registry is essential for their access to carbon markets. Whereas, those favouring a more decentralised approach want to maintain the original spirit of cooperative approaches under Article 6—with Article 6.2 providing a decentralised path, and Article 6.4 providing a centralised one. They also fear that centralisation could harm the market’s ability to differentiate carbon credit quality.
In Bonn, countries agreed to continue consideration on the eligibility of emissions avoidance under Article 6.2 and 6.4 at the 68th meeting of the Subsidiary Bodies in 2028. They also clarified that, in the meantime, emissions avoidance activities are not included in the current guidance for Article 6.2 and 6.4. However, without a globally agreed definition of emissions avoidance, market confusion is, unfortunately, likely to persist between now and 2028.
Overall, the spirit in Bonn was positive and constructive; however, much work remains to resolve the outstanding issues. Hopefully the goodwill engendered in Bonn will set up countries for a productive session in Baku. In the meantime, national-level progress to operationalize Article 6 will and should push forward, as the lessons we learn from Article 6 implementation provide the greatest insights to help inform negotiations and improve future guidance.
As in previous years, the private sector will continue to play will play a pivotal role in Article 6 operationalization by serving as project developers, carbon credit buyers, capacity builders, investors and more. By staying apprised of Article 6 developments, carbon market stakeholders can confidently navigate current and emerging Article 6 guidance, as well as their implications for the voluntary carbon market.
*1. It is important to be aware of the erroneous conflation of avoided deforestation as avoided emissions. Forests experiencing deforestation are a current emissions source and an intervention is needed to reduce those emissions, thus representing emissions reductions. Alternatively, the restoration of degraded forests or afforestation/reforestation activities to enhance forest carbon stocks and represent emissions removals.
15 April 2025 / WORDS BY Pollination Foundation
read article
Receive latest news and global perspectives from Pollination.
By clicking submit, you agree to our Terms & Conditions.